PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPFD vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPFD vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.11% return.


FPFD

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
1.65%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-4.17%
1M
-19.46%
YTD
-44.11%
6M
-44.07%
1Y
-28.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPFD vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.66%6.46%1.79%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-44.11%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FPFD and FETH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPFD vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPFD vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPFDFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.98

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

-0.42

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

-0.70

+7.54

FPFD vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFD and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPFD vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPFDFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-67.57%

+46.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-67.57%

+64.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-65.81%

+64.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-33.69%

+26.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

40.48%

-39.70%

Volatility

FPFD vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 0.74%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPFDFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

19.78%

-19.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

46.89%

-44.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98%

69.15%

-66.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

72.38%

-67.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.30%

72.38%

-67.08%

FPFD vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPFD vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.15%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPFD and FETH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (19.78%) compared to FPFD (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs FETH's -67.57%.

On 1-year performance, FPFD leads with 5.33% vs -28.45% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 5.33% return vs -28.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.

FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.25% for FETH.

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPFD and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer