PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPFD vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPFD vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -36.91% return.


FPFD

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.03%
6M
0.04%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-2.51%
1M
4.47%
6M
-43.01%
YTD
-36.91%
1Y
-44.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPFD vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
0.96%6.46%1.79%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-36.91%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FPFD and FETH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPFD vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPFD vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPFDFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.92

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.66

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

-1.03

+6.72

FPFD vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFD and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPFD vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPFDFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-67.94%

+47.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-67.94%

+65.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-61.40%

+60.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-34.68%

+28.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

43.63%

-42.80%

Volatility

FPFD vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 0.64%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPFDFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

14.59%

-13.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

47.31%

-45.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

68.50%

-65.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

71.81%

-66.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

71.81%

-66.54%

FPFD vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPFD vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.29%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPFD and FETH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (14.59%) compared to FPFD (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs FETH's -67.94%.

On 1-year performance, FPFD leads with 4.69% vs -44.82% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 4.69% return vs -44.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.

FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.25% for FETH.

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPFD and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer