FPFD vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FPFD (Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPFD returned 1.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBND. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPFD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

FPFD vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.72% return.

FPFD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPFD vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF	0.66%	6.46%	8.50%	10.91%	-17.11%	1.84%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.72%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-12.54%	1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FPFD and FBND is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.49

The correlation between FPFD and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FPFD vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPFD

FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 52
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 35
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPFD vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPFD	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.24	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	1.84	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.77	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	5.07	+1.77

FPFD vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFD and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPFD vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPFD	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-17.25%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.75%	-2.66%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.92%	-5.94%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-17.25%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-1.21%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	-3.34%	-3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.93%	-0.15%

Volatility

FPFD vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 0.74%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPFD	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	1.13%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.28%	2.84%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98%	3.83%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.31%	5.93%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.30%	6.10%	-0.80%

FPFD vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPFD vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.69%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF	5.15%	5.04%	4.89%	5.09%	5.22%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPFD and FBND in my portfolio?

FPFD and FBND have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPFD or FBND?

FBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to FPFD (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which ETF is better, FPFD or FBND?

On 5-year performance, FPFD leads with 1.65% vs 0.79% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPFD or FBND?

Over the 5-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 1.65% return vs 0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPFD or FBND?

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPFD or FBND?

FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.69% for FBND.

What is the main difference between FPFD and FBND?

FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.36% for FBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.