FPFD vs. FBND
FPFD (Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FPFD returned 7.66%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for FBND. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FPFD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
FPFD vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPFD achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.50% return.
FPFD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FPFD vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 0.73% | 6.46% | 8.50% | 10.91% | -17.11% | 1.89% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPFD and FBND is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FPFD and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
FPFD vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPFD
FBND
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FPFD
FBND
Utilities
FPFD
FBND
Communication Services
FPFD
FBND
-
Real Estate
FPFD
FBND
-
Technology
FPFD
FBND
-
Industrials
FPFD
FBND
Consumer Cyclical
FPFD
FBND
-
Basic Materials
FPFD
-
FBND
-
Consumer Defensive
FPFD
-
FBND
-
Energy
FPFD
-
FBND
Healthcare
FPFD
-
FBND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPFD vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
FPFD
FBND
FPFD vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPFD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.11 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 6.37 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPFD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.46 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.44 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FPFD vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPFD drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFD and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPFD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -17.25% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -2.66% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -5.94% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.43% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -3.35% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.88% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FPFD vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) is 1.00%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that FPFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPFD | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 1.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 2.73% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 3.86% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 5.92% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 6.10% | -0.78% |
FPFD vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPFD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPFD vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
FPFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than FBND's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FPFD Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.15% | 5.04% | 4.89% | 5.09% | 5.22% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPFD and FBND have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to FPFD (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFD dropped -20.83% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 3-year performance, FPFD leads with 7.66% vs 4.70% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FPFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FPFD has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPFD.
FPFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.70% for FBND.
FPFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPFD and 0.36% for FBND.
FPFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPFD and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer