FPE vs. PFLD
FPE (First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. FPE is actively managed, while PFLD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPE returned 3.08%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PFLD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.
Performance
FPE vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 2.69% return.
FPE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FPE vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPE First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 0.97% | 9.21% | 11.17% | 6.84% | -12.77% | 5.24% | 6.00% | 1.61% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.69% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPE and PFLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FPE and PFLD has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FPE vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPE
PFLD
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
FPE
PFLD
-
Utilities
FPE
PFLD
Real Estate
FPE
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
FPE
PFLD
-
Communication Services
FPE
PFLD
-
Industrials
FPE
PFLD
-
Basic Materials
FPE
-
PFLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
FPE
-
PFLD
-
Energy
FPE
-
PFLD
-
Healthcare
FPE
-
PFLD
-
Technology
FPE
-
PFLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPE vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
FPE
PFLD
FPE vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPE | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.81 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 12.46 | -2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPE | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.85 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.14 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.17 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
FPE vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPE drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, roughly equal to the maximum PFLD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPE and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPE | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -33.20% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -2.23% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -6.41% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -15.51% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -4.17% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.50% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FPE vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPE) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.84%. This indicates that FPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPE | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.84% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 2.26% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 3.39% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 7.50% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 13.38% | -3.21% |
FPE vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPE vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
FPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPE First Trust Preferred Securities & Income ETF | 5.84% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.03% | 5.67% | 4.48% | 4.88% | 5.32% | 6.14% | 5.39% | 5.97% | 5.49% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPE and PFLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPE has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to PFLD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPE dropped -33.35% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, FPE leads with 3.08% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, PFLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FPE has performed better with a 3.08% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPE.
FPE has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FPE and 0.45% for PFLD.
FPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPE and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer