FPBFX vs. NUVB
FPBFX (Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund) is Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while NUVB (Nuvation Bio Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FPBFX returned 11.45%/yr vs -9.69%/yr for NUVB. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPBFX achieves a 33.43% return, which is significantly higher than NUVB's -35.71% return.
FPBFX
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 7.75%
- YTD
- 33.43%
- 6M
- 34.61%
- 1Y
- 61.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
NUVB
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- 22.03%
- YTD
- -35.71%
- 6M
- -39.62%
- 1Y
- 192.39%
- 3Y*
- 48.47%
- 5Y*
- -9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 33.43% | 37.15% | 9.26% | 14.07% | -23.71% | 2.28% | 19.71% |
NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | -35.71% | 236.84% | 76.16% | -21.35% | -77.41% | -27.35% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPBFX and NUVB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2020 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPBFX vs. NUVB — Risk / Return Rank
FPBFX
NUVB
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPBFX | NUVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 3.36 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.98 | 5.98 | +12.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPBFX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, smaller than the maximum NUVB drawdown of -93.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPBFX and NUVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPBFX | NUVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.06% | -93.39% | +24.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -57.55% | +45.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.48% | -58.19% | +38.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -90.41% | +52.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -60.47% | +60.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.56% | -65.45% | +47.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 32.31% | -29.00% |
Volatility
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) is 9.74%, while Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that FPBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPBFX | NUVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 18.51% | -8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.08% | 53.26% | -35.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 88.66% | -67.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 75.34% | -55.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 73.04% | -55.16% |
Dividends
FPBFX vs. NUVB - Dividend Comparison
FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, while NUVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund | 6.14% | 8.19% | 5.99% | 5.36% | 8.76% | 14.97% | 4.45% | 0.75% | 10.88% | 4.36% | 2.38% | 3.61% |
NUVB Nuvation Bio Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPBFX and NUVB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUVB has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to FPBFX (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPBFX dropped -69.06% vs NUVB's -93.39%.
FPBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPBFX and NUVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer