FPACX vs. FPAG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG).

FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993. FPAG is an actively managed fund by FPA. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021.

Performance

FPACX vs. FPAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FPACX vs. FPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	-3.27%	17.69%	12.42%	20.30%	-9.20%	2.22%
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF	-2.21%	25.17%	15.64%	29.55%	-17.87%	2.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPACX achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than FPAG's -2.21% return.

FPACX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -6.57%
• YTD: -3.27%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 14.07%
• 3Y*: 13.33%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

FPAG

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -8.66%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 22.71%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPACX vs. FPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPACX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FPAG's 0.49% expense ratio.

FPACX

FPA Crescent Fund

FPAG

FPA Global Equity ETF

Return for Risk

FPACX vs. FPAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPACX

FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FPAG

FPAG Risk / Return Rank: 70
FPAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FPAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FPAG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FPAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FPAG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPACX vs. FPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPACX	FPAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.17	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.75	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	1.82	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	6.73	-0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FPACX vs. FPAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FPAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPACX and FPAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPACX	FPAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.17	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.56	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between FPACX and FPAG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FPACX vs. FPAG - Dividend Comparison

FPACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than FPAG's 1.55% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	9.92%	9.60%	7.95%	3.72%	0.77%	11.62%	4.80%	4.65%	8.87%	3.70%	4.98%	6.34%
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF	1.55%	1.99%	1.42%	1.51%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FPACX vs. FPAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPACX drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than FPAG's maximum drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPACX and FPAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPACX	FPAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.60%	-28.43%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-12.31%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.19%	-9.21%	+2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-6.51%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.32%	-1.28%

Volatility

FPACX vs. FPAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) is 3.28%, while FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that FPACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPACX	FPAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	6.67%	-3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.37%	11.01%	-4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	19.55%	-8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.86%	19.50%	-7.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.17%	19.50%	-6.33%