FOWF vs. YCS
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 22.10% vs 32.82% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FOWF vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
FOWF vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 9.44% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and YCS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | -0.09 |
The correlation between FOWF and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
YCS
FOWF vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.97 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 12.40 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.92 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.33 | +1.30 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -49.56% | +37.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.30% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | 0.00% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -19.93% | +17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.66% | +0.50% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 2.75% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 12.32% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 17.27% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 21.10% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 19.01% | -2.12% |
FOWF vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOWF and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FOWF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOWF dropped -12.29% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 32.82% vs 22.10% for FOWF. On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 32.82% return vs 22.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FOWF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FOWF and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOWF and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer