PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOWF vs. TRFK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOWF vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 17.78% return.


FOWF

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.81%
6M
10.69%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRFK

1D
1.75%
1M
18.67%
YTD
17.78%
6M
8.26%
1Y
79.04%
3Y*
42.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOWF vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
8.81%29.15%0.39%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
17.78%26.81%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FOWF and TRFK is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.60

The correlation between FOWF and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOWF vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOWF
FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOWF vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOWFTRFKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

3.03

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

3.70

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.72

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.92

8.95

+4.97

FOWF vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOWF Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOWF and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOWFTRFKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

3.03

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

1.19

+0.58

Drawdowns

FOWF vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and TRFK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FOWFTRFKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-29.06%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-19.56%

+9.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

0.00%

-3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-6.21%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

8.12%

-5.50%

Volatility

FOWF vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is 6.53%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FOWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FOWFTRFKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

10.12%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

20.29%

-9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

26.35%

-12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

28.64%

-11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

28.64%

-11.65%

FOWF vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOWF vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
0.73%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%