FOWF vs. TRFK
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 79.04% for TRFK. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.
Performance
FOWF vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 17.78% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRFK
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 18.67%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 79.04%
- 3Y*
- 42.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 17.78% | 26.81% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and TRFK is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FOWF and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
TRFK
FOWF vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 3.03 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.70 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.72 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 8.95 | +4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 3.03 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.19 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and TRFK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -29.06% | +16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -19.56% | +9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | 0.00% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -6.21% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 8.12% | -5.50% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is 6.53%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FOWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 10.12% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 20.29% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 26.35% | -12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 28.64% | -11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 28.64% | -11.65% |
FOWF vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |