FOWF vs. TOLZ
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds — FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index while TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 17.71% for TOLZ. At 0.36, their price movements are largely independent. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.49% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.49% | 14.76% | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and TOLZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.36 |
The correlation between FOWF and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
TOLZ
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 1.72 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 2.41 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.68 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 12.41 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.72 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.42 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and TOLZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -39.33% | +27.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -5.18% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.97% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -6.68% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.53% | +1.09% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.47%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 3.47% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 7.40% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 10.42% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.90% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.29% | +0.70% |
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than TOLZ's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.65% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |