FOWF vs. ROKT
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds — FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index while ROKT tracks the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 126.38% for ROKT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ROKT.
Performance
FOWF vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 35.46% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROKT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 35.46%
- 6M
- 47.65%
- 1Y
- 126.38%
- 3Y*
- 42.17%
- 5Y*
- 23.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 35.46% | 50.56% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and ROKT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FOWF and ROKT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
ROKT
FOWF vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 4.86 | -2.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 5.48 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.72 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 10.97 | -7.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 43.41 | -29.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 4.86 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.84 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and ROKT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -43.16% | +30.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -11.40% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | 0.00% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -6.83% | +5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.88% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is 6.53%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that FOWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | ROKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 10.89% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 22.90% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 26.29% | -12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 22.05% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 24.83% | -7.84% |
FOWF vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than ROKT's 0.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.29% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% |