FOTO vs. STHH
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. FOTO is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
FOTO vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -23.24%
- 6M
- 87.74%
- YTD
- 107.29%
- 1Y
- 114.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 100.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.45M | $6.59M | $20.09M | |
| $179.41K | $298.65K | $521.22K |
FOTO vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -23.30% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | -22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and STHH is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH
FOTO vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -37.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -37.98% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.07% | -33.80% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -10.91% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.65% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 48.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.72% | 56.48% | +24.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 55.09% | +25.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.72% | 55.09% | +25.63% |
FOTO vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.97% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and STHH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.19% for STHH.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer