PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOTO vs. EUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOTO vs. EUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOTO

1D
4.81%
1M
-7.92%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EUV

1D
3.71%
1M
-8.30%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.76M$21.63M$39.49M
$6.45M$6.59M$20.09M

FOTO vs. EUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FOTO and EUV is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOTO vs. EUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOTO vs. EUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOTO vs. EUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than EUV's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and EUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOTOEUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-35.33%

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.07%

-24.73%

-5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-10.30%

-9.36%

Volatility

FOTO vs. EUV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOTOEUVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.72%

72.69%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.72%

72.69%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.72%

72.69%

+8.03%

FOTO vs. EUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EUV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOTO vs. EUV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FOTO nor EUV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FOTO and EUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EUV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.

FOTO and EUV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.35% for EUV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOTO and EUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer