PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOTO vs. CORD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOTO vs. CORD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOTO

1D
4.81%
1M
-7.92%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CORD

1D
-38.98%
1M
-43.53%
6M
-79.14%
YTD
-89.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.72M$28.82M$27.21M
$6.45M$6.59M$20.09M

FOTO vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FOTO and CORD is -0.53, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOTO vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOTO vs. CORD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOTO vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum CORD drawdown of -93.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and CORD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOTOCORDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-93.69%

+52.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.07%

-92.92%

+62.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-62.37%

+42.71%

Volatility

FOTO vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOTOCORDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.72%

194.31%

-113.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.72%

194.31%

-113.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.72%

194.31%

-113.59%

FOTO vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CORD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOTO vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FOTO nor CORD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FOTO and CORD have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOTO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOTO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CORD.

FOTO and CORD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FOTO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CORD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 1.50% for CORD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOTO and CORD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer