FOTO vs. ASMH
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FOTO is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
FOTO vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- -5.59%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 36.58%
- YTD
- 71.44%
- 1Y
- 143.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOTO vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -23.70% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and ASMH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASMH
FOTO vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -30.43%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.43% | -15.89% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.43% | -10.51% | -19.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | -4.41% | -11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.76% | 43.78% | +32.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.76% | 41.26% | +35.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.76% | 41.26% | +35.50% |
FOTO vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 1.63% | 0.19% |
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and ASMH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.
ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.19% for ASMH.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer