PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSIX vs. STBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOSIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.60%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
2.32%
ALL TIME*
3.48%

STBFX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
0.60%5.86%5.47%5.81%-4.44%-0.65%3.97%4.35%1.01%2.17%
STBFX
Sextant Short Term Bond Fund
0.28%4.92%3.87%3.79%-4.16%-1.09%3.42%4.03%1.09%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSIX and STBFX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FOSIX and STBFX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSIX vs. STBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOSIX
FOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

STBFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSIXSTBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSIXSTBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

Volatility

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSIXSTBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.96%

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than STBFX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSIX vs. STBFX - Dividend Comparison

FOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than STBFX's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
3.90%4.36%4.30%2.86%2.30%1.81%2.19%2.41%2.20%2.26%2.04%1.34%
STBFX
Sextant Short Term Bond Fund
2.06%3.17%2.77%1.84%1.04%1.07%1.60%1.75%1.47%1.30%1.06%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSIX and STBFX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSIX and STBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer