PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSIX vs. FONPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSIX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FONPX's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSIX has outperformed FONPX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while FONPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.


FOSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.71%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.36%

FONPX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.32%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.58%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
0.39%5.86%5.47%5.81%-4.44%-0.65%3.97%4.35%1.01%2.17%
FONPX
Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund
1.14%5.26%0.63%4.76%-6.17%0.01%4.68%5.69%1.29%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSIX and FONPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSIX vs. FONPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSIX
FOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FONPX
FONPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FONPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FONPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FONPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FONPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FONPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSIXFONPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.66

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.22

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

7.39

+3.01

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the FONPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSIX and FONPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSIX drawdown since its inception was -6.58%, smaller than the maximum FONPX drawdown of -10.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSIX and FONPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSIXFONPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-10.92%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-2.54%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.31%

-5.09%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.57%

-10.92%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.58%

-10.92%

+4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.58%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-1.91%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.76%

-0.42%

Volatility

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Volatility Comparison

Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund (FONPX) have volatilities of 0.65% and 0.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSIXFONPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.68%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

1.76%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

2.18%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

3.24%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.95%

3.29%

-1.34%

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FONPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSIX vs. FONPX - Dividend Comparison

FOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than FONPX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FONPX
Tributary Nebraska Tax-Free Fund
2.62%2.47%2.39%2.39%1.81%1.84%1.92%2.69%3.36%3.55%3.10%0.00%
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
4.19%4.36%4.30%2.86%2.30%1.81%2.19%2.41%2.20%2.26%2.04%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSIX and FONPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FONPX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to FOSIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSIX dropped -6.58% vs FONPX's -10.92%.

FONPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSIX and FONPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer