PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSIX vs. FOSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSIX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FOSCX's 24.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSIX has underperformed FOSCX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while FOSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.67% annualized return.


FOSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.71%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.36%

FOSCX

1D
1.82%
1M
6.06%
YTD
24.97%
6M
22.24%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
0.39%5.86%5.47%5.81%-4.44%-0.65%3.97%4.35%1.01%2.17%
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
24.97%-3.67%9.35%16.92%-13.17%32.03%1.21%23.18%-10.81%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSIX and FOSCX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1996

-0.11

The correlation between FOSIX and FOSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSIX vs. FOSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSIX
FOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FOSCX
FOSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FOSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSIXFOSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.23

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

8.81

+1.59

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FOSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSIX and FOSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSIX drawdown since its inception was -6.58%, smaller than the maximum FOSCX drawdown of -52.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSIX and FOSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSIXFOSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-52.57%

+45.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-9.16%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.31%

-29.00%

+27.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.57%

-29.00%

+22.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.58%

-40.05%

+33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-7.06%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

3.35%

-3.01%

Volatility

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) is 0.65%, while Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that FOSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSIXFOSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

5.02%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

12.07%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

17.63%

-15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

20.65%

-18.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.95%

21.91%

-19.96%

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FOSCX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSIX vs. FOSCX - Dividend Comparison

FOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than FOSCX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
6.09%7.61%6.67%2.82%13.61%15.18%0.02%1.28%5.45%5.28%1.51%0.00%
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
4.19%4.36%4.30%2.86%2.30%1.81%2.19%2.41%2.20%2.26%2.04%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSIX and FOSCX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOSCX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to FOSIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSIX dropped -6.58% vs FOSCX's -52.57%.

FOSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSIX and FOSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer