FOSIX vs. FOBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX).
FOSIX is managed by Tributary Funds. It was launched on Dec 14, 1992. FOBAX is managed by Tributary Funds. It was launched on Aug 5, 1996.
Performance
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOSIX Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.28% | 5.86% | 5.47% | 5.81% | -4.44% | -0.65% | 3.97% | 4.35% | 1.01% | 2.17% |
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund | -4.23% | 10.30% | 14.28% | 17.11% | -15.11% | 16.27% | 12.64% | 21.41% | -2.11% | 13.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOSIX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than FOBAX's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSIX has underperformed FOBAX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while FOBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.
FOSIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
FOBAX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -3.15%
- 1Y
- 8.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOSIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FOBAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOSIX vs. FOBAX — Risk / Return Rank
FOSIX
FOBAX
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOSIX | FOBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 0.82 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 1.23 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 0.99 | +2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 4.47 | +8.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOSIX | FOBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.82 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.60 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | 0.75 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.71 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOSIX and FOBAX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Dividend Comparison
FOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than FOBAX's 10.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOSIX Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.80% | 4.36% | 4.30% | 2.86% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.19% | 2.41% | 2.20% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 1.34% |
FOBAX Tributary Balanced Fund | 10.29% | 9.82% | 5.32% | 5.36% | 5.59% | 8.10% | 5.80% | 4.43% | 7.55% | 8.29% | 6.73% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOSIX drawdown since its inception was -6.58%, smaller than the maximum FOBAX drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSIX and FOBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOSIX | FOBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -40.00% | +33.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.31% | -7.46% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.57% | -19.88% | +13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.58% | -22.37% | +15.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -5.92% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -3.83% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 1.66% | -1.34% |
Volatility
FOSIX vs. FOBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) is 0.63%, while Tributary Balanced Fund (FOBAX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that FOSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOSIX | FOBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 2.87% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 5.53% | -4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 10.41% | -8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.24% | 10.45% | -8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 10.94% | -9.01% |