PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSIX vs. BATAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSIX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSIX has underperformed BATAX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while BATAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.


FOSIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.97%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.38%

BATAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.43%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
3.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
0.61%5.86%5.47%5.81%-4.44%-0.65%3.97%4.35%1.01%2.17%
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
1.98%7.37%7.34%6.43%-5.87%1.72%2.75%6.76%2.20%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSIX and BATAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FOSIX and BATAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSIX vs. BATAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSIX
FOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BATAX
BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOSIXBATAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

3.13

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

7.91

-4.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.18

-0.73

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

7.36

-4.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.57

30.86

-18.29

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the BATAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSIX and BATAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOSIXBATAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

3.13

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

1.58

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.22

1.18

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Drawdowns

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSIX drawdown since its inception was -6.58%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSIX and BATAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSIXBATAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-17.42%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-0.94%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.31%

-1.15%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.57%

-8.12%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.58%

-17.42%

+10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-1.30%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.22%

+0.12%

Volatility

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund (FOSIX) is 0.61%, while BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that FOSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSIXBATAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.66%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

1.49%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

2.04%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.27%

2.18%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.95%

3.07%

-1.12%

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSIX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison

FOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than BATAX's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
5.73%5.92%5.45%3.91%3.14%1.82%3.22%4.73%5.36%4.10%0.40%0.00%
FOSIX
Tributary Short-Intermediate Bond Fund
4.19%4.36%4.30%2.86%2.30%1.81%2.19%2.41%2.20%2.26%2.04%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSIX and BATAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BATAX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to FOSIX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSIX dropped -6.58% vs BATAX's -17.42%.

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSIX and BATAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer