PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOOD.TO vs. DEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) and Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOOD.TO
Goodfood Market Corp.
-40.30%-11.84%55.10%-45.56%-88.94%-66.42%287.22%17.23%8.10%122.30%
DEA
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
3.08%-22.36%-0.04%-0.42%-29.34%5.36%-2.00%51.65%-15.91%4.76%
Different Trading Currencies

FOOD.TO is traded in CAD, while DEA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DEA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOOD.TO:

CA$19.70M

DEA:

$978.55M

EPS

FOOD.TO:

-CA$0.09

DEA:

$0.29

PS Ratio

FOOD.TO:

0.17

DEA:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOOD.TO:

CA$113.76M

DEA:

$336.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOOD.TO:

CA$47.03M

DEA:

$224.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

FOOD.TO:

CA$3.21M

DEA:

$230.45M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOOD.TO achieves a -40.30% return, which is significantly lower than DEA's 3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FOOD.TO has underperformed DEA with an annualized return of -15.76%, while DEA has yielded a comparatively higher -0.78% annualized return.


FOOD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.00%
YTD
-40.30%
6M
-33.33%
1Y
-6.98%
3Y*
-29.05%
5Y*
-52.93%
10Y*
-15.76%

DEA

1D
-1.44%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
3.08%
6M
-3.17%
1Y
-15.54%
3Y*
-6.62%
5Y*
-8.32%
10Y*
-0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOOD.TO vs. DEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOOD.TO
FOOD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FOOD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOOD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOOD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FOOD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOOD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DEA
DEA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) and Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOOD.TODEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

-0.56

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

-0.58

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.92

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.61

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-1.04

-0.15

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOOD.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the DEA Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOOD.TO and DEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOOD.TODEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.56

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

-0.35

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

-0.03

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

0.06

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between FOOD.TO and DEA is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Dividend Comparison

FOOD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOOD.TO
Goodfood Market Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEA
Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
8.51%9.50%9.33%7.89%7.43%4.58%4.59%4.38%6.63%4.69%4.60%3.14%

Drawdowns

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOOD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than DEA's maximum drawdown of -62.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.TO and DEA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FOOD.TODEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-62.19%

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.38%

-24.55%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.74%

-56.38%

-42.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

-62.19%

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.62%

-56.52%

-42.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-22.46%

-36.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.22%

13.13%

+12.09%

Volatility

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Volatility Comparison

Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) at 5.14%. This indicates that FOOD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FOOD.TODEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.31%

5.14%

+14.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.89%

15.34%

+31.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.01%

27.88%

+64.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.68%

23.80%

+52.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.23%

23.80%

+51.43%

Financials

FOOD.TO vs. DEA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodfood Market Corp. and Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
27.54M
87.04M
(FOOD.TO) Total Revenue
(DEA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FOOD.TO values in CAD, DEA values in USD