FOOD.TO vs. BITS
FOOD.TO (Goodfood Market Corp.) is a stock, while BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the NONE. Over the past 3 years, FOOD.TO returned -25.11%/yr vs 47.68%/yr for BITS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FOOD.TO is traded in CAD, while BITS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BITS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOOD.TO achieves a -37.31% return, which is significantly lower than BITS's -4.71% return.
FOOD.TO
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- -37.31%
- 6M
- -8.70%
- 1Y
- 40.00%
- 3Y*
- -25.11%
- 5Y*
- -51.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BITS
- 1D
- -7.93%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -13.03%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 47.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD.TO Goodfood Market Corp. | -37.31% | -11.84% | 55.10% | -45.56% | -88.94% | -43.47% |
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -4.71% | 9.63% | 75.75% | 205.35% | -73.71% | -28.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOOD.TO and BITS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FOOD.TO and BITS shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOOD.TO vs. BITS — Risk / Return Rank
FOOD.TO
BITS
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOOD.TO | BITS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.24 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 0.44 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOOD.TO | BITS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 0.02 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOOD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than BITS's maximum drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.TO and BITS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOOD.TO | BITS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -81.70% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.38% | -49.04% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.04% | -49.04% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.55% | -38.68% | -59.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -41.21% | -16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.35% | 26.77% | -1.42% |
Volatility
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Volatility Comparison
Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.22% compared to Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) at 13.11%. This indicates that FOOD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOOD.TO | BITS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.22% | 13.11% | +6.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.90% | 40.61% | +9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.46% | 52.28% | +36.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.45% | 59.09% | +18.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.80% | 59.09% | +10.71% |
Dividends
FOOD.TO vs. BITS - Dividend Comparison
FOOD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 24.30% | 22.80% | 29.49% | 13.69% | 0.48% | 1.90% |
FOOD.TO Goodfood Market Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOOD.TO and BITS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FOOD.TO and BITS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer