FOOD.TO vs. NEGG
FOOD.TO (Goodfood Market Corp.) and NEGG (Newegg Commerce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — FOOD.TO in Personal Services, NEGG in Internet Retail. Over the past 5 years, FOOD.TO returned -51.67%/yr vs -37.42%/yr for NEGG. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FOOD.TO is traded in CAD, while NEGG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEGG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOOD.TO achieves a -37.31% return, which is significantly higher than NEGG's -65.30% return.
FOOD.TO
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- -37.31%
- 6M
- -8.70%
- 1Y
- 40.00%
- 3Y*
- -25.11%
- 5Y*
- -51.67%
- 10Y*
- —
NEGG
- 1D
- -5.82%
- 1M
- -44.34%
- YTD
- -65.30%
- 6M
- -76.38%
- 1Y
- 67.85%
- 3Y*
- -8.84%
- 5Y*
- -37.42%
- 10Y*
- -23.10%
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD.TO Goodfood Market Corp. | -37.31% | -11.84% | 55.10% | -45.56% | -88.94% | -66.42% | 287.22% | 17.23% | 8.10% | 7.39% |
NEGG Newegg Commerce, Inc. | -65.30% | 510.90% | -65.84% | -5.94% | -86.47% | 147.62% | 49.99% | -71.48% | -29.74% | 38.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOOD.TO and NEGG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.08 |
The correlation between FOOD.TO and NEGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FOOD.TO:
-CA$0.13
NEGG:
-$1.16
FOOD.TO:
0.20
NEGG:
0.26
FOOD.TO:
CA$105.76M
NEGG:
$1.31B
FOOD.TO:
CA$39.66M
NEGG:
$148.16M
FOOD.TO:
CA$510.00K
NEGG:
-$19.73M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG — Risk / Return Rank
FOOD.TO
NEGG
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) and Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOOD.TO | NEGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.79 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 1.20 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOOD.TO | NEGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.37 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 | -0.25 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | -0.19 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOOD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum NEGG drawdown of -99.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.TO and NEGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOOD.TO | NEGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -99.77% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.38% | -86.34% | +39.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.04% | -90.04% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.74% | -99.71% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.55% | -98.86% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -83.99% | +25.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.35% | 56.92% | -31.57% |
Volatility
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goodfood Market Corp. (FOOD.TO) is 19.22%, while Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) has a volatility of 21.95%. This indicates that FOOD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOOD.TO | NEGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.22% | 21.95% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.90% | 62.88% | -12.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.46% | 196.94% | -108.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.45% | 152.04% | -74.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.80% | 145.40% | -75.60% |
Dividends
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither FOOD.TO nor NEGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FOOD.TO vs. NEGG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodfood Market Corp. and Newegg Commerce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FOOD.TO and NEGG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FOOD.TO and NEGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer