PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOKFX vs. BLUEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOKFX achieves a 28.00% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return.


FOKFX

1D
0.90%
1M
11.67%
YTD
28.00%
6M
26.89%
1Y
59.16%
3Y*
32.88%
5Y*
18.58%
10Y*

BLUEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
28.00%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-6.58%4.45%7.24%14.35%-14.30%3.22%34.74%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FOKFX and BLUEX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FOKFX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOKFX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOKFXBLUEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.90

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

-0.55

+5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.97

-1.37

+21.34

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOKFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOKFX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOKFXBLUEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27

-0.67

+3.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.03

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Drawdowns

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOKFX drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOKFX and BLUEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOKFXBLUEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-54.27%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-12.19%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-12.19%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.26%

-21.87%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.53%

+8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-13.37%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.85%

-1.84%

Volatility

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.48%. This indicates that FOKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOKFXBLUEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.48%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

7.75%

+6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

9.98%

+8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

10.62%

+12.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

16.59%

+8.04%

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOKFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOKFX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.28%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOKFX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOKFX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOKFX dropped -37.26% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOKFX and BLUEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer