FOF vs. IRFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX).
FOF is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 24, 2006. IRFIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Mar 30, 2005.
Performance
FOF vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOF vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | -0.96% | 13.01% | 23.65% | 17.90% | -22.69% | 28.24% | 1.52% | 31.37% | -9.43% | 23.41% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | -4.81% | 23.52% | -10.56% | 4.58% | -23.84% | 7.66% | -0.81% | 23.74% | -3.74% | 23.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOF achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FOF has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.
FOF
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
IRFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOF vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOF vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FOF
IRFIX
FOF vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOF | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.86 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 3.90 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOF | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | -0.14 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.16 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.18 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOF and IRFIX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FOF vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison
FOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than IRFIX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 8.14% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund | 6.48% | 6.17% | 3.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | 7.70% | 3.40% | 9.81% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 6.46% | 3.36% |
Drawdowns
FOF vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOF drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum IRFIX drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOF and IRFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOF | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -70.13% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -14.85% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -38.41% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.74% | -39.51% | -10.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -20.71% | +7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -18.69% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.29% | +0.44% |
Volatility
FOF vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) at 5.06%. This indicates that FOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOF | IRFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 5.06% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 9.13% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 13.55% | +5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 15.12% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 15.59% | +4.66% |