PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOCPX vs. FSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCPX achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSCPX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FOCPX has outperformed FSCPX with an annualized return of 22.63%, while FSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


FOCPX

1D
0.78%
1M
10.68%
YTD
27.59%
6M
28.74%
1Y
61.90%
3Y*
34.85%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
22.63%

FSCPX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.10%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
27.59%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
0.24%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCPX and FSCPX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1990

0.76

The correlation between FOCPX and FSCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOCPX vs. FSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOCPXFSCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.55

0.78

+2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.40

1.22

+3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.14

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

0.92

+4.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.59

2.92

+21.68

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the FSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCPX and FSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOCPXFSCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

0.78

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.27

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.55

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.54

+0.12

Drawdowns

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCPX drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than FSCPX's maximum drawdown of -57.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCPX and FSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOCPXFSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-57.76%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-15.99%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

-27.71%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.05%

-39.23%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.05%

-39.23%

+2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.05%

+5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-8.55%

-8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

5.02%

-2.47%

Volatility

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) is 5.41%, while Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that FOCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOCPXFSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

5.99%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

13.67%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

18.93%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

24.78%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

22.72%

-0.28%

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCPX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOCPX vs. FSCPX - Dividend Comparison

FOCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, less than FSCPX's 9.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.09%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.17%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOCPX and FSCPX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCPX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to FOCPX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCPX dropped -70.25% vs FSCPX's -57.76%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOCPX and FSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer