FNX vs. VFMV
FNX (First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FNX is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNX returned 8.47%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VFMV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
FNX vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.76% return.
FNX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FNX vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 12.62% | 9.87% | 12.21% | 20.39% | -13.57% | 25.05% | 16.04% | 26.97% | -12.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.76% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNX and VFMV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FNX and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNX vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNX
VFMV
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
FNX
VFMV
Financial Services
FNX
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
FNX
VFMV
Healthcare
FNX
VFMV
Technology
FNX
VFMV
Real Estate
FNX
VFMV
Energy
FNX
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
FNX
VFMV
Basic Materials
FNX
VFMV
-
Utilities
FNX
VFMV
Communication Services
FNX
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNX vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
FNX
VFMV
FNX vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNX | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.26 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 8.85 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNX | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.54 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
FNX vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNX | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -33.64% | -23.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -6.00% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.97% | -10.35% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.97% | -15.41% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.81% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -3.64% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.53% | +1.15% |
Volatility
FNX vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.04%. This indicates that FNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNX | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.04% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 6.30% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 8.80% | +7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 11.75% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 14.25% | +7.71% |
FNX vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNX vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNX and VFMV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.87% vs 8.47% for FNX. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.82% for FNX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.13% for VFMV.
FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNX and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer