PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. FDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. FDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than FDLS's 14.19% return.


FNX

1D
0.72%
1M
1.59%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.05%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.88%

FDLS

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.01%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. FDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
12.62%9.87%12.21%20.39%-5.24%
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
14.19%22.47%7.41%20.70%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and FDLS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022

0.91

The correlation between FNX and FDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNX vs. FDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
FDLS

Industrials

19.3%
18.8%

Financial Services

18.6%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

10.4%
11.7%

Technology

9.5%
25.7%

Real Estate

8.6%
2.1%

Energy

6.2%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.0%

Utilities

2.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.3%

Industrials

FNX
19.3%
FDLS
18.8%

Financial Services

FNX
18.6%
FDLS
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
14.4%
FDLS
4.4%

Healthcare

FNX
10.4%
FDLS
11.7%

Technology

FNX
9.5%
FDLS
25.7%

Real Estate

FNX
8.6%
FDLS
2.1%

Energy

FNX
6.2%
FDLS
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNX
4.0%
FDLS
4.9%

Basic Materials

FNX
3.1%
FDLS
5.0%

Utilities

FNX
2.7%
FDLS
1.7%

Communication Services

FNX
2.2%
FDLS
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. FDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLS
FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. FDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNXFDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.68

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

14.74

-4.33

FNX vs. FDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FDLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and FDLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNXFDLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.10

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.87

-0.45

Drawdowns

FNX vs. FDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than FDLS's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and FDLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXFDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-23.32%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.55%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-23.32%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.74%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-3.88%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.38%

+0.30%

Volatility

FNX vs. FDLS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXFDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.33%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

12.47%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

16.70%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

19.07%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

19.07%

+2.89%

FNX vs. FDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLS's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. FDLS - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FDLS's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
0.86%0.86%7.26%0.97%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.82%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX and FDLS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDLS has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FNX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs FDLS's -23.32%.

On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 20.38% vs 17.56% for FNX. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 20.38% return vs 17.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

FDLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.82% for FNX.

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.76% for FDLS.

FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and FDLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer