FNV vs. UL
FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. FNV operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FNV returned 12.94%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for UL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNV vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -12.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 12.94%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
FNV
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 29.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
UL
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 6M
- -8.37%
- 1Y
- -18.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
FNV vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 3.78% | 77.81% | 7.41% | -17.96% | -0.39% | 11.57% | 22.31% | 48.92% | -11.00% | 35.45% |
UL The Unilever Group | -12.75% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNV and UL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FNV and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FNV:
$41.49B
UL:
$123.13B
FNV:
$7.10
UL:
$5.06
FNV:
30.25
UL:
11.08
FNV:
0.63
UL:
2.17
FNV:
19.71
UL:
1.20
FNV:
5.10
UL:
7.93
FNV:
$2.10B
UL:
$109.27B
FNV:
$1.61B
UL:
$90.89B
FNV:
$1.96B
UL:
$24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNV vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
FNV
UL
FNV vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.87 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.73 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | -1.53 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | -0.86 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.01 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.21 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FNV vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -53.55% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.40% | -25.09% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.64% | -25.09% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.12% | -26.53% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.12% | -30.13% | -6.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.40% | -23.50% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -10.60% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.83% | 11.93% | -2.10% |
Volatility
FNV vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 5.63%. This indicates that FNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNV | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 5.63% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.10% | 18.17% | +11.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.00% | 21.26% | +14.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 20.83% | +9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 21.62% | +8.56% |
Dividends
FNV vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than UL's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.74% | 0.73% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 1.35% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 1.81% |
UL The Unilever Group | 4.07% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
FNV vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franco-Nevada Corporation and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FNV vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
FNV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.42M and revenue of 641.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FNV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 503.23M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
FNV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 462.11M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FNV and UL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNV has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to UL (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs UL's -53.55%.
FNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNV and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer