PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. TDTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNV vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than TDTT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV has outperformed TDTT with an annualized return of 13.89%, while TDTT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.


FNV

1D
-2.88%
1M
2.31%
YTD
10.72%
6M
13.36%
1Y
30.92%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
13.89%

TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
10.72%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%11.57%22.31%48.92%-11.00%35.45%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.67%3.96%4.40%-4.58%5.49%6.84%5.74%0.25%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and TDTT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2011

0.24

The correlation between FNV and TDTT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNVTDTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

5.17

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.14

16.59

-13.45

FNV vs. TDTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the TDTT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and TDTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNVTDTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.54

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.78

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.92

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.69

-0.23

Drawdowns

FNV vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than TDTT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and TDTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNVTDTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-6.97%

-51.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.62%

-0.90%

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-1.53%

-28.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-6.97%

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-6.97%

-30.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.28%

-0.14%

-18.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-1.60%

-12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.87%

0.28%

+9.59%

Volatility

FNV vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) at 0.46%. This indicates that FNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNVTDTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

0.46%

+10.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

1.21%

+27.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.24%

1.85%

+33.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

3.67%

+26.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.07%

3.38%

+26.69%

Dividends

FNV vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than TDTT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.69%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNV and TDTT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNV has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to TDTT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs TDTT's -6.97%.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV and TDTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer