FNOV vs. QB

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds - FNOV tracks the S&P 500 while QB tracks the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNOV returned 16.52% vs 18.83% for QB. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

FNOV vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNOV achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 12.67% return.

FNOV

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 6.24%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.50%
• 6M: 11.39%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 1Y: 18.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNOV vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	7.23%	10.54%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	12.67%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FNOV and QB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.75

The correlation between FNOV and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNOV vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNOV	QB
Technology	39.0%	49.9%
Financial Services	11.1%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.6%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.3%	5.3%
Industrials	7.8%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.6%
Energy	3.1%	0.6%
Utilities	2.1%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

FNOV vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNOV

FNOV Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 95
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNOV vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNOV	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.69	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.91	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.64	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	5.44	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	26.25	-11.17

FNOV vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the QB Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNOV and QB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNOV vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNOV drawdown since its inception was -24.41%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNOV and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNOV	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.41%	-3.47%	-20.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.71%	-3.47%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-0.42%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.72%	+0.38%

Volatility

FNOV vs. QB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) is 2.17%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that FNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNOV	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.86%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.10%	5.82%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.57%	7.03%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.53%	6.93%	+4.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.60%	6.93%	+6.67%

FNOV vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNOV vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

FNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.77%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNOV and QB in my portfolio?

FNOV and QB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNOV or QB?

QB has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to FNOV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNOV dropped -24.41% vs QB's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, FNOV or QB?

On 1-year performance, QB leads with 18.83% vs 16.52% for FNOV. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNOV or QB?

Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNOV or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNOV or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for FNOV.

What is the main difference between FNOV and QB?

FNOV tracks S&P 500, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FNOV and 0.58% for QB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.