FNMIX vs. EIDOX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNMIX (Fidelity New Markets Income Fund) and EIDOX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FNMIX returned 4.02%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for EIDOX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNMIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EIDOX.

Performance

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMIX achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than EIDOX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FNMIX has underperformed EIDOX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while EIDOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.

FNMIX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 15.19%
• 3Y*: 12.87%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

EIDOX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 7.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	3.73%	14.86%	6.80%	14.00%	-16.09%	-2.42%	4.62%	10.93%	-7.77%	10.16%
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I	6.63%	15.59%	14.78%	11.40%	-6.25%	1.52%	7.39%	18.25%	-4.28%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FNMIX and EIDOX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.56

The correlation between FNMIX and EIDOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNMIX vs. EIDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNMIX

FNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EIDOX

EIDOX Risk / Return Rank: 97
EIDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EIDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EIDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EIDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.55	5.61	-2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.95	8.69	-2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	2.54	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	5.33	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.87	21.60	-3.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is lower than the EIDOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMIX and EIDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.55	5.61	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	1.73	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	1.67	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.73	-0.93

Drawdowns

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMIX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than EIDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMIX and EIDOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-19.06%	-23.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-3.56%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.42%	-3.97%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.16%	-17.42%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.16%	-19.06%	-8.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.12%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-2.47%	-3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.88%	0.00%

Volatility

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Markets Income Fund (FNMIX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX) at 0.70%. This indicates that FNMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNMIX	EIDOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	0.70%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.60%	2.98%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44%	3.38%	+1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	4.64%	+1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.93%	4.74%	+2.19%

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNMIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EIDOX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNMIX vs. EIDOX - Dividend Comparison

FNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than EIDOX's 10.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I	10.73%	9.41%	8.52%	8.97%	9.13%	7.82%	7.66%	7.81%	8.10%	7.85%	4.10%	0.00%
FNMIX Fidelity New Markets Income Fund	4.89%	5.07%	4.71%	5.15%	3.93%	3.48%	4.06%	4.87%	4.98%	5.77%	6.93%	4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNMIX and EIDOX in my portfolio?

FNMIX and EIDOX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNMIX or EIDOX?

FNMIX has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to EIDOX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMIX dropped -42.76% vs EIDOX's -19.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 3.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.