PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNITX vs. FGKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 22.73% return.


FNITX

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.45%
YTD
11.69%
6M
10.71%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
16.83%

FGKFX

1D
-1.20%
1M
1.38%
YTD
22.73%
6M
16.53%
1Y
48.45%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
11.69%22.36%34.61%35.61%-26.67%24.10%23.30%8.91%
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
22.73%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and FGKFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FNITX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNITX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNITX
FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNITXFGKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.40

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

17.06

-5.04

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and FGKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNITXFGKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-40.14%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-11.40%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-27.38%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.06%

-40.14%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-1.75%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-9.96%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.93%

-0.53%

Volatility

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) is 6.87%, while Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that FNITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNITXFGKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

7.66%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

15.78%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

19.83%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

24.33%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

25.79%

-6.41%

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNITX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNITX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.16%11.08%6.33%6.43%18.00%13.42%8.54%6.62%14.33%7.86%4.99%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNITX and FGKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGKFX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to FNITX (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNITX and FGKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer