PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNITX vs. FFLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNITX vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's 10.63% return.


FNITX

1D
1.39%
1M
-4.39%
6M
4.07%
YTD
6.07%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
15.46%
ALL TIME*
11.29%

FFLC

1D
0.86%
1M
0.31%
6M
8.00%
YTD
10.63%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.09M$5.30M$5.23M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNITX vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
6.07%22.36%34.61%35.61%-26.67%24.10%22.05%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
10.63%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and FFLC is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.80

The correlation between FNITX and FFLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNITX vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNITX
FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNITX vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNITXFFLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.82

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

7.92

-2.83

FNITX vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and FFLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNITXFFLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-19.72%

-30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.98%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-19.72%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.06%

-19.72%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-1.19%

-6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-2.95%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.29%

+0.56%

Volatility

FNITX vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 3.59%. This indicates that FNITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNITXFFLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.59%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

10.97%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

13.86%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

16.93%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

17.61%

+1.75%

FNITX vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNITX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNITX vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, more than FFLC's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.99%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.65%11.08%6.33%6.43%18.00%13.42%8.54%6.62%14.33%7.86%4.99%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FNITX and FFLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNITX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FFLC (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNITX and FFLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer