PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNITX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNITX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FNITX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


FNITX

1D
0.02%
1M
3.48%
YTD
9.30%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
27.24%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
16.12%

CTCAX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.00%
YTD
32.06%
6M
31.15%
1Y
61.81%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.30%22.36%34.61%35.61%-26.67%24.10%23.30%28.81%-4.89%27.76%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
32.06%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FNITX and CTCAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.89

The correlation between FNITX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNITX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNITX
FNITX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FNITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNITX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FNITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNITX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNITXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.43

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

16.56

-4.64

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNITX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNITXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.04

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.00

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.78

-0.15

Drawdowns

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNITX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNITX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNITXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-61.04%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-14.43%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-26.67%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.06%

-39.55%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

-39.55%

+7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-10.68%

+3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.86%

-1.51%

Volatility

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M (FNITX) is 3.54%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that FNITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNITXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

6.37%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

16.72%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

21.06%

-6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

25.98%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

24.84%

-5.55%

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNITX and CTCAX have an expense ratio of 1.18%.


Dividends

FNITX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

FNITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than CTCAX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.49%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
FNITX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class M
9.36%11.08%6.33%6.43%18.00%13.42%8.54%6.62%14.33%7.86%4.99%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNITX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to FNITX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNITX dropped -49.84% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNITX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer