FNGZX vs. IVFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX).
FNGZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 2, 2008. IVFIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008.
Performance
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGZX Franklin International Growth Fund | -12.37% | 10.54% | 0.66% | 15.24% | -31.87% | 0.45% | 32.90% | 37.18% | -14.30% | 36.28% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 5.22% | 31.79% | 1.91% | 11.05% | -2.54% | 11.58% | -1.74% | 20.15% | -11.96% | 14.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than IVFIX's 5.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGZX has underperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.06% annualized return.
FNGZX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -14.13%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 0.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
IVFIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGZX and IVFIX have an expense ratio of 0.86%.
Return for Risk
FNGZX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FNGZX
IVFIX
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGZX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.98 | -2.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 2.58 | -2.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 4.08 | -4.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 17.43 | -18.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGZX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.98 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.83 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.49 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.21 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGZX and IVFIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison
FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than IVFIX's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGZX Franklin International Growth Fund | 3.85% | 3.37% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 0.30% | 2.04% | 1.31% | 0.90% | 0.36% |
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 3.14% | 3.37% | 4.44% | 4.01% | 3.99% | 3.67% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 4.97% | 4.17% | 3.38% | 3.95% |
Drawdowns
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, roughly equal to the maximum IVFIX drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and IVFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGZX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -51.49% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.29% | -8.47% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.63% | -21.29% | -26.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.63% | -33.46% | -14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.85% | -6.58% | -24.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -11.69% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 1.98% | +2.90% |
Volatility
FNGZX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that FNGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGZX | IVFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.54% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 8.10% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 14.63% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 12.96% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 14.74% | +5.44% |