PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGZX vs. LMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than LMGEX's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGZX has underperformed LMGEX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while LMGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.


FNGZX

1D
0.06%
1M
4.33%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
-0.46%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-3.29%
10Y*
6.31%

LMGEX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.62%
6M
10.01%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
-0.57%10.54%0.66%15.24%-31.87%0.45%32.90%37.18%-14.30%36.28%
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.62%32.05%3.42%18.48%-13.55%12.87%2.74%17.61%-16.67%23.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGZX and LMGEX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2008

0.84

The correlation between FNGZX and LMGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGZX vs. LMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGZX
FNGZX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LMGEX
LMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGZXLMGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.22

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.54

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

5.53

-5.67

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the LMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGZX and LMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGZXLMGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

1.19

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.54

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.49

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.27

-0.06

Drawdowns

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum LMGEX drawdown of -63.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and LMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGZXLMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.35%

-63.37%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.29%

-11.64%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-13.05%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-28.98%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.63%

-39.79%

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.54%

-2.09%

-19.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-18.21%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

3.25%

+2.77%

Volatility

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) have volatilities of 4.69% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGZXLMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.70%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

12.31%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

15.18%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

15.81%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

16.19%

+4.13%

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than LMGEX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGZX vs. LMGEX - Dividend Comparison

FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than LMGEX's 7.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
3.39%3.37%2.07%0.00%1.74%1.11%2.23%0.30%2.04%1.31%0.90%0.36%
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.69%8.28%5.68%1.51%2.88%5.10%0.58%0.49%1.62%1.60%1.30%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGZX and LMGEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGEX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FNGZX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGZX dropped -53.35% vs LMGEX's -63.37%.

LMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGZX and LMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer