PortfoliosLab logo
FNGZX vs. PHYL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGZX and PHYL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNGZX:

0.42

PHYL:

2.22

Sortino Ratio

FNGZX:

0.62

PHYL:

3.11

Omega Ratio

FNGZX:

1.08

PHYL:

1.47

Calmar Ratio

FNGZX:

0.19

PHYL:

2.30

Martin Ratio

FNGZX:

1.26

PHYL:

11.70

Ulcer Index

FNGZX:

5.53%

PHYL:

0.89%

Daily Std Dev

FNGZX:

20.34%

PHYL:

4.67%

Max Drawdown

FNGZX:

-47.65%

PHYL:

-22.06%

Current Drawdown

FNGZX:

-21.54%

PHYL:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGZX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than PHYL's 3.16% return.


FNGZX

YTD

9.80%

1M

7.17%

6M

5.56%

1Y

8.37%

3Y*

5.24%

5Y*

2.43%

10Y*

5.19%

PHYL

YTD

3.16%

1M

1.61%

6M

2.40%

1Y

10.29%

3Y*

6.15%

5Y*

5.64%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGZX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGZX vs. PHYL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGZX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGZX is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGZX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGZX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGZX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGZX is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYL is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYL is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FNGZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the PHYL Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGZX and PHYL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison

FNGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than PHYL's 7.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNGZX
Franklin International Growth Fund
1.89%2.07%0.00%1.74%2.07%2.23%0.30%2.04%1.84%0.90%0.36%1.23%
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
7.97%8.28%7.62%6.55%6.13%7.51%7.30%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGZX drawdown since its inception was -47.65%, which is greater than PHYL's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGZX and PHYL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FNGZX vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund (FNGZX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) at 1.18%. This indicates that FNGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...