FNGS vs. SHNY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY).

FNGS and SHNY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. SHNY is managed by BMO. It was launched on Feb 24, 2023.

Performance

FNGS vs. SHNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGS vs. SHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	-10.61%	18.64%	51.99%	61.08%
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	11.56%	214.54%	50.30%	12.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than SHNY's 11.56% return.

FNGS

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -10.61%
• 6M: -12.74%
• 1Y: 20.77%
• 3Y*: 31.31%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: —

SHNY

• 1D: 5.04%
• 1M: -32.72%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 39.19%
• 1Y: 123.55%
• 3Y*: 69.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGS vs. SHNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SHNY's 0.95% expense ratio.

SHNY

MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN

FNGS

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

Return for Risk

FNGS vs. SHNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

SHNY

SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 74
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGS vs. SHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGS	SHNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.51	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.94	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	2.24	-1.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	6.74	-3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGS vs. SHNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SHNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGS and SHNY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGS	SHNY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	1.51	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.34	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between FNGS and SHNY is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FNGS vs. SHNY - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGS nor SHNY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGS vs. SHNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum SHNY drawdown of -54.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and SHNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGS	SHNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.98%	-54.35%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.93%	-54.35%	+31.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.66%	-41.30%	+23.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.02%	-13.16%	+2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.52%	18.10%	-10.58%

Volatility

FNGS vs. SHNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 8.61%, while MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) has a volatility of 31.37%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGS	SHNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	31.37%	-22.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.82%	74.62%	-58.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.04%	82.54%	-55.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	58.30%	-28.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.34%	58.30%	-26.96%