FNGG vs. HDV
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged), while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNGG returned 58.90%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for HDV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNGG charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
FNGG vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 13.48% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- -4.34%
- 1M
- 15.65%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 47.84%
- 3Y*
- 58.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 22.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
FNGG vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 23.30% | 27.21% | 98.76% | 204.23% | -87.15% | -3.07% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 13.48% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and HDV is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between FNGG and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FNGG vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGG
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FNGG
HDV
Communication Services
FNGG
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
FNGG
HDV
Basic Materials
FNGG
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
FNGG
-
HDV
Energy
FNGG
-
HDV
Financial Services
FNGG
-
HDV
Healthcare
FNGG
-
HDV
Industrials
FNGG
-
HDV
Real Estate
FNGG
-
HDV
-
Utilities
FNGG
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
HDV
FNGG vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 4.30 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 11.97 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.29 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.73 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -37.04% | -54.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | -5.18% | -37.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | -10.49% | -36.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -1.86% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -3.09% | -52.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.25% | 1.86% | +14.39% |
Volatility
FNGG vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.23%. This indicates that FNGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 3.23% | +9.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 7.54% | +23.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.86% | 9.75% | +30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.64% | 12.82% | +54.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.64% | 15.73% | +51.91% |
FNGG vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than HDV's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 9.61% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.89% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and HDV have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGG has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to HDV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGG dropped -91.33% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 3-year performance, FNGG leads with 58.90% vs 15.28% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FNGG has performed better with a 58.90% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 2.89% for HDV.
FNGG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. FNGG tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged), while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for FNGG and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer