FNGD vs. LRND
FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return, -300% Daily), while LRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNGD returned -68.00%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for LRND. Their -0.87 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for LRND.
Performance
FNGD vs. LRND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -47.15% return, which is significantly lower than LRND's 15.75% return.
FNGD
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -19.83%
- 6M
- -56.69%
- YTD
- -47.15%
- 1Y
- -57.22%
- 3Y*
- -68.00%
- 5Y*
- -64.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -70.62%
LRND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.62M | $14.13M | $19.76M | |
| $43.61K | $1.79M | $1.88M |
FNGD vs. LRND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -47.15% | -61.42% | -76.57% | -90.14% | 14.48% |
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 15.75% | 20.31% | 21.68% | 44.13% | -19.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and LRND is -0.88, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022 | -0.87 |
The correlation between FNGD and LRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNGD vs. LRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGD
LRND
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FNGD
LRND
Communication Services
FNGD
LRND
Consumer Cyclical
FNGD
LRND
Financial Services
FNGD
LRND
Basic Materials
FNGD
-
LRND
Consumer Defensive
FNGD
-
LRND
Energy
FNGD
-
LRND
-
Healthcare
FNGD
-
LRND
Industrials
FNGD
-
LRND
Real Estate
FNGD
-
LRND
Utilities
FNGD
-
LRND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGD vs. LRND — Risk / Return Rank
FNGD
LRND
FNGD vs. LRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGD | LRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.29 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.07 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 7.36 | -8.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. LRND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LRND's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and LRND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGD | LRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -25.43% | -74.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.11% | -13.83% | -54.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.52% | -21.06% | -76.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -0.20% | -99.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -6.15% | -81.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.53% | 3.89% | +31.64% |
Volatility
FNGD vs. LRND - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 24.18% compared to IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) at 5.65%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGD | LRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.18% | 5.65% | +18.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.69% | 13.61% | +43.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.93% | 16.84% | +51.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.06% | 20.01% | +70.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.04% | 20.01% | +71.03% |
FNGD vs. LRND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LRND's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGD vs. LRND - Dividend Comparison
FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 0.40% | 0.67% | 0.97% | 1.22% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGD and LRND have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGD has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to LRND (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs LRND's -25.43%.
On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 22.99% vs -68.00% for FNGD. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, LRND has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 22.99% return vs -68.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.
LRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.
FNGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LRND is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return, -300% Daily), while LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: BMO and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.14% for LRND.
LRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGD and LRND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer