PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGD vs. LRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGD vs. LRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -47.15% return, which is significantly lower than LRND's 15.75% return.


FNGD

1D
1.83%
1M
-19.83%
6M
-56.69%
YTD
-47.15%
1Y
-57.22%
3Y*
-68.00%
5Y*
-64.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-70.62%

LRND

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.69%
6M
18.38%
YTD
15.75%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.62M$14.13M$19.76M
$43.61K$1.79M$1.88M

FNGD vs. LRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNGD
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-47.15%-61.42%-76.57%-90.14%14.48%
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
15.75%20.31%21.68%44.13%-19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and LRND is -0.88, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022

-0.87

The correlation between FNGD and LRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGD vs. LRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNGD
LRND

Technology

59.6%
60.0%

Communication Services

30.0%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
7.1%

Financial Services

10.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

11.2%

Industrials

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FNGD
59.6%
LRND
60.0%

Communication Services

FNGD
30.0%
LRND
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNGD
10.4%
LRND
7.1%

Financial Services

FNGD
10.0%
LRND
0.0%

Basic Materials

FNGD

-

LRND
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

FNGD

-

LRND
1.7%

Energy

FNGD

-

LRND

-

Healthcare

FNGD

-

LRND
11.2%

Industrials

FNGD

-

LRND
5.3%

Real Estate

FNGD

-

LRND
0.0%

Utilities

FNGD

-

LRND

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGD vs. LRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGD
FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LRND
LRND Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGD vs. LRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNGDLRNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.29

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.07

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

7.36

-8.98

FNGD vs. LRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the LRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and LRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. LRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LRND's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and LRND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGDLRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-25.43%

-74.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.11%

-13.83%

-54.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.52%

-21.06%

-76.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-0.20%

-99.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-6.15%

-81.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.53%

3.89%

+31.64%

Volatility

FNGD vs. LRND - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 24.18% compared to IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) at 5.65%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGDLRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.18%

5.65%

+18.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.69%

13.61%

+43.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.93%

16.84%

+51.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.06%

20.01%

+70.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.04%

20.01%

+71.03%

FNGD vs. LRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LRND's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGD vs. LRND - Dividend Comparison

FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FNGD
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
0.40%0.67%0.97%1.22%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGD and LRND have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGD has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to LRND (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs LRND's -25.43%.

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 22.99% vs -68.00% for FNGD. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, LRND has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 22.99% return vs -68.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.

LRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.

FNGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LRND is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return, -300% Daily), while LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: BMO and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.14% for LRND.

LRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGD and LRND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer