PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGD vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGD vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGD vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's -21.97% return.


FNGD

1D
-13.84%
1M
13.47%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.62%
1Y
-57.82%
3Y*
-65.85%
5Y*
-59.96%
10Y*

AMDG

1D
7.34%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-21.97%
6M
16.89%
1Y
133.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGD vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGD vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD
FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGDAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.76

1.04

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

2.13

-3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.28

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.32

-3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.82

4.53

-5.36

FNGD vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGDAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

1.04

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.35

-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and AMDG is -0.52. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FNGD vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.36%.


Drawdowns

FNGD vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGDAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-63.04%

-36.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.53%

-56.48%

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-52.31%

-47.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.98%

-27.66%

-59.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.84%

28.88%

+42.96%

Volatility

FNGD vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) is 24.51%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that FNGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGDAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

33.06%

-8.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

98.59%

-53.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.65%

129.74%

-51.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.85%

124.94%

-36.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.51%

124.94%

-33.43%