FNGAX vs. APHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX).
FNGAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008. APHIX is an actively managed fund by Artisan Partners. It was launched on Jul 1, 1997.
Performance
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -12.38% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 36.91% | -14.53% | 36.80% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 3.79% | 36.49% | 10.89% | 14.52% | -19.35% | 9.10% | 7.84% | 29.43% | -10.81% | 31.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -12.38% return, which is significantly lower than APHIX's 3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGAX has underperformed APHIX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while APHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.
FNGAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -12.54%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- -1.17%
- 3Y*
- -0.16%
- 5Y*
- -4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
APHIX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than APHIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNGAX vs. APHIX — Risk / Return Rank
FNGAX
APHIX
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGAX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | 1.86 | -1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 2.39 | -2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 2.53 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 10.66 | -11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGAX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 1.86 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.62 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.58 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.29 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGAX and APHIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Dividend Comparison
FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than APHIX's 21.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.72% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 21.80% | 22.63% | 10.37% | 2.10% | 2.84% | 23.52% | 3.45% | 5.44% | 10.02% | 0.91% | 1.50% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum APHIX drawdown of -68.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and APHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGAX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -68.47% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -9.77% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.24% | -33.73% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | -33.73% | -13.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.82% | -9.77% | -21.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -23.20% | +9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.59% | +2.31% |
Volatility
FNGAX vs. APHIX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX) at 6.04%. This indicates that FNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGAX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 6.04% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 10.13% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 15.33% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 15.61% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 16.16% | +4.02% |