PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNF vs. AXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNF vs. AXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than AXS's -0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FNF has outperformed AXS with an annualized return of 11.80%, while AXS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.56% annualized return.


FNF

1D
0.00%
1M
5.63%
6M
-4.38%
YTD
-3.41%
1Y
-1.66%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.80%
ALL TIME*
9.47%

AXS

1D
0.52%
1M
-6.61%
6M
2.80%
YTD
-0.30%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
9.56%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$96.29M$89.26M$75.08M
$84.95M$74.32M$79.12M

FNF vs. AXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
-3.41%4.35%14.02%42.18%-21.64%38.04%-10.34%48.75%-17.22%65.53%
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
-0.30%22.96%63.90%5.57%2.63%11.81%-11.92%18.26%5.75%-20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FNF and AXS is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FNF:

$13.89B

AXS:

$7.72B

EPS

FNF:

$2.82

AXS:

$19.10

PE Ratio

FNF:

18.33

AXS:

5.54

PS Ratio

FNF:

0.94

AXS:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNF:

$14.81B

AXS:

$5.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNF:

$7.82B

AXS:

$2.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

FNF:

$2.12B

AXS:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNF vs. AXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNF
FNF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AXS
AXS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNF vs. AXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNFAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.13

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

1.22

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

2.79

-2.95

FNF vs. AXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNF Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the AXS Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNF and AXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNF vs. AXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNF drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, which is greater than AXS's maximum drawdown of -55.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNF and AXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNFAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.49%

-55.93%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-12.67%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.06%

-16.73%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.69%

-18.99%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.21%

-49.31%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-11.24%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.14%

-12.10%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.75%

5.53%

+5.22%

Volatility

FNF vs. AXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) is 9.90%, while AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that FNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNFAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

13.22%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

20.39%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.12%

25.10%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.17%

25.40%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

26.86%

+1.39%

Dividends

FNF vs. AXS - Dividend Comparison

FNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than AXS's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
1.66%1.64%1.99%3.18%3.19%3.10%3.27%2.71%3.04%3.04%2.19%2.17%
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
3.96%3.60%3.46%3.59%4.57%2.99%3.45%2.78%3.82%37.01%2.59%2.31%

Financials

FNF vs. AXS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FNF and AXS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXS has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to FNF (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNF dropped -72.49% vs AXS's -55.93%.

AXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNF and AXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer