PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXS vs. MBUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AXS vs. MBUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) and Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXS achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly higher than MBUU's -6.52% return. Over the past 10 years, AXS has outperformed MBUU with an annualized return of 10.07%, while MBUU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.


AXS

1D
2.38%
1M
3.45%
YTD
-3.03%
6M
-4.31%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
27.36%
5Y*
19.44%
10Y*
10.07%

MBUU

1D
-3.23%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-6.52%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
-16.42%
3Y*
-22.32%
5Y*
-18.77%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXS vs. MBUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
-3.03%22.96%63.90%5.57%2.63%11.81%-11.92%18.26%5.75%-20.96%
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
-6.52%-24.95%-31.43%2.85%-22.45%10.07%52.48%17.67%17.05%55.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AXS and MBUU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2014

0.24

The correlation between AXS and MBUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AXS:

$7.77B

MBUU:

$505.40M

EPS

AXS:

$13.77

MBUU:

-$0.05

PS Ratio

AXS:

1.21

MBUU:

0.61

PB Ratio

AXS:

1.22

MBUU:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

AXS:

$6.61B

MBUU:

$826.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AXS:

$3.55B

MBUU:

$127.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

AXS:

$2.61B

MBUU:

$7.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXS vs. MBUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXS
AXS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MBUU
MBUU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MBUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBUU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MBUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBUU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXS vs. MBUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) and Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AXSMBUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.99

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

-0.42

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

-0.66

+1.04

AXS vs. MBUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXS Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the MBUU Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXS and MBUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AXS vs. MBUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXS drawdown since its inception was -55.93%, smaller than the maximum MBUU drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXS and MBUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXSMBUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.93%

-73.94%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.60%

-39.37%

+24.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.73%

-60.27%

+43.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.99%

-71.77%

+52.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.31%

-73.94%

+24.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-71.32%

+66.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-31.46%

+19.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.78%

25.01%

-18.23%

Volatility

AXS vs. MBUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) is 7.96%, while Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) has a volatility of 12.10%. This indicates that AXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXSMBUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

12.10%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

36.05%

-20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.61%

52.78%

-30.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.94%

45.06%

-20.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

46.99%

-20.39%

Dividends

AXS vs. MBUU - Dividend Comparison

AXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while MBUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
1.70%1.64%1.99%3.18%3.19%3.10%3.27%2.71%3.04%3.04%2.19%2.17%
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AXS vs. MBUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AXIS Capital Holdings Limited and Malibu Boats, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.64B
235.70M
(AXS) Total Revenue
(MBUU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AXS vs. MBUU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AXIS Capital Holdings Limited and Malibu Boats, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.9%
19.0%
Portfolio components
AXS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.

MBUU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.70M and revenue of 235.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

AXS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 90.2%.

MBUU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.91M and revenue of 235.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.8%.

AXS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported a net income of 254.77M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

MBUU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Malibu Boats, Inc. reported a net income of -2.44M and revenue of 235.70M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXS and MBUU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBUU has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to AXS (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXS dropped -55.93% vs MBUU's -73.94%.

AXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXS and MBUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer