FNDX vs. SCHK
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while SCHK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDX returned 12.82%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
FNDX vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 11.04% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 6.11% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.04% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 31.31% | -5.09% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and SCHK is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FNDX and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
SCHK
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
SCHK
Financial Services
FNDX
SCHK
Healthcare
FNDX
SCHK
Energy
FNDX
SCHK
Communication Services
FNDX
SCHK
Industrials
FNDX
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
SCHK
Basic Materials
FNDX
SCHK
Utilities
FNDX
SCHK
Real Estate
FNDX
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
SCHK
FNDX vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDX | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.41 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.35 | 3.11 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.97 | 14.34 | +6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDX | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.29 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.77 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.78 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than SCHK's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -34.80% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -8.97% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -19.21% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | -25.44% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.74% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -5.18% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.94% | -0.39% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 2.25%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.98% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 9.17% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 12.16% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.23% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 19.12% | -1.62% |
FNDX vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDX vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDX and SCHK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHK has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.14% vs 12.82% for FNDX. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.01% for SCHK.
FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHK is Large Cap Growth Equities. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.05% for SCHK.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer