FNDX vs. DLN
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDX returned 14.48%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for DLN. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
FNDX vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 14.48%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.86% annualized return.
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 30.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
DLN
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
FNDX vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.31% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.95% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and DLN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FNDX and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
DLN
Financial Services
FNDX
DLN
Healthcare
FNDX
DLN
Communication Services
FNDX
DLN
Energy
FNDX
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
DLN
Industrials
FNDX
DLN
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
DLN
Basic Materials
FNDX
DLN
Utilities
FNDX
DLN
Real Estate
FNDX
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
DLN
FNDX vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.43 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 3.53 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.42 | 14.80 | +4.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -57.84% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -6.10% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -13.71% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | -16.26% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -35.82% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.12% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -7.50% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.45% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that FNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.78% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 7.00% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 9.03% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 13.27% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 16.14% | +1.34% |
FNDX vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDX vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FNDX and DLN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNDX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.48% vs 12.86% for DLN. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.28% for DLN.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer