FNDX vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
FNDX and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
FNDX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 2.76% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 15.44% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's -1.41% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
BDGS
FNDX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDX | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.99 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.67 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.80 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 9.34 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDX | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.99 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.51 | -0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and BDGS is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FNDX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.62% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -9.12% | -28.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -5.85% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -2.15% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -0.67% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.13% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that FNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.39% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 5.09% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 10.70% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 8.35% | +6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 8.35% | +9.16% |