FNDX vs. AVLV
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FNDX is passively managed, while AVLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNDX returned 19.99%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for AVLV. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
FNDX vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 23.60% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- 33.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.17%
AVLV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.88M | $105.15M | $154.25M | |
| $78.80M | $81.53M | $109.49M |
FNDX vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 18.49% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 8.77% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 23.60% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and AVLV is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FNDX and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
AVLV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
AVLV
Financial Services
FNDX
AVLV
Healthcare
FNDX
AVLV
Energy
FNDX
AVLV
Industrials
FNDX
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
AVLV
Communication Services
FNDX
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
AVLV
Basic Materials
FNDX
AVLV
Utilities
FNDX
AVLV
Real Estate
FNDX
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
AVLV
FNDX vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.56 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 5.96 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.12 | 24.13 | -2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -19.50% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -6.39% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -19.50% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.82% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.58% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 2.53% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 8.88% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 12.35% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 17.17% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.17% | +0.28% |
FNDX vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDX vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than AVLV's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.05% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FNDX and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVLV has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to FNDX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 21.00% vs 19.99% for FNDX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 19.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.05% for AVLV.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.15% for AVLV.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer