PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDX vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDX vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.


FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%

AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%7.15%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and AVLV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.96

The correlation between FNDX and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDX vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDX
AVLV

Technology

19.1%
17.2%

Financial Services

14.1%
16.3%

Healthcare

12.0%
5.6%

Energy

10.3%
14.4%

Communication Services

10.1%
6.9%

Industrials

9.3%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
2.0%

Utilities

3.2%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Technology

FNDX
19.1%
AVLV
17.2%

Financial Services

FNDX
14.1%
AVLV
16.3%

Healthcare

FNDX
12.0%
AVLV
5.6%

Energy

FNDX
10.3%
AVLV
14.4%

Communication Services

FNDX
10.1%
AVLV
6.9%

Industrials

FNDX
9.3%
AVLV
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDX
9.2%
AVLV
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNDX
7.4%
AVLV
7.7%

Basic Materials

FNDX
3.7%
AVLV
2.0%

Utilities

FNDX
3.2%
AVLV
0.3%

Real Estate

FNDX
1.8%
AVLV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDX vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDXAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.57

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

6.09

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.97

24.39

-3.42

FNDX vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDXAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

3.18

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.86

-0.07

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDXAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-19.50%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-6.39%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.50%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-3.93%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.59%

-0.04%

Volatility

FNDX vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 2.25%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDXAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

3.12%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

9.04%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

12.29%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.35%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.35%

+0.15%

FNDX vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDX vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FNDX and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 20.90% for FNDX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.15% for AVLV.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDX and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer