FNDX vs. AVLV
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index while AVLV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNDX returned 20.90%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
FNDX vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 7.15% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and AVLV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FNDX and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
AVLV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
AVLV
Financial Services
FNDX
AVLV
Healthcare
FNDX
AVLV
Energy
FNDX
AVLV
Communication Services
FNDX
AVLV
Industrials
FNDX
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
AVLV
Basic Materials
FNDX
AVLV
Utilities
FNDX
AVLV
Real Estate
FNDX
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
AVLV
FNDX vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.57 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.35 | 6.09 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.97 | 24.39 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 3.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.86 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -19.50% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -6.39% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -19.50% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -3.93% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.59% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 2.25%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 3.12% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 9.04% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 12.29% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.35% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.35% | +0.15% |
FNDX vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDX vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FNDX and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 20.90% for FNDX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.15% for AVLV.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer