PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. FNSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than FNSOX's 0.37% return.


FNDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*

FNSOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
0.42%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.37%6.01%3.90%4.90%-5.76%-1.25%4.28%4.95%1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and FNSOX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.83

The correlation between FNDSX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSOX
FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDSXFNSOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.83

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.99

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.57

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.39

8.53

-3.14

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the FNSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and FNSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDSXFNSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.83

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.56

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.84

-0.51

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than FNSOX's maximum drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and FNSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXFNSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-8.92%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.47%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-1.51%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-8.77%

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-0.60%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-1.73%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.44%

+0.54%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) at 0.68%. This indicates that FNDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXFNSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.68%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

1.51%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

2.07%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

2.89%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.31%

2.47%

+2.84%

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FNSOX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.95%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.22%2.80%1.74%0.81%0.80%1.54%2.61%2.04%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDSX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDSX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to FNSOX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.

FNSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and FNSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer