PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDSX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.30% return.


FNDSX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.88%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.54%

BND

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.30%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
1.40%
ALL TIME*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$459.14M$504.12M$590.88M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNDSX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
-0.88%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.30%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and BND is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FNDSX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDSX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDSXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

1.86

+0.08

FNDSX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-18.58%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.68%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.10%

-4.81%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-17.81%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-2.92%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-3.06%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.07%

+0.13%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 0.99% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.02%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

2.91%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

3.61%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

6.03%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

5.53%

-0.25%

FNDSX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than BND's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.04%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.70%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FNDSX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to FNDSX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs BND's -18.58%.

FNDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer