PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDSX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDSX having a -0.66% return and FXNAX slightly higher at -0.63%.


FNDSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.29%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.57%

FXNAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
-0.66%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.63%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDSX and FXNAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.98

The correlation between FNDSX and FXNAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDSX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDSXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.01

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

2.55

-0.12

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDSX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDSX drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDSX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDSXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-19.51%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.94%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.10%

-5.11%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-18.54%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-3.89%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-3.86%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.17%

+0.02%

Volatility

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) have volatilities of 0.99% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDSXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.99%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

3.02%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.85%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

6.07%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.28%

5.01%

+0.27%

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDSX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDSX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FNDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than FXNAX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.70%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.46%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FNDSX and FXNAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXNAX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to FNDSX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDSX dropped -19.72% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FXNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDSX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer